[cure-news] Slavery Disclosure - City of Chicago ex rel. Bob Brown v. Archdiocese of Chicago
Ida Hakim
hakimida
Thu Nov 1 14:20:05 PDT 2007
For Immediate Release!
Please Forward!
Oral Arguments in the historic and precedent-setting qui tam and slavery
disclosure lawsuit, which is captioned City of Chicago ex rel. Bob Brown
v. Archdiocese of Chicago, et al.
will be heard at 10:00 am, on Friday, November 9, 2007, in Courtroom
2607 at the Daley Center, 45 West Washington Street, in Chicago. Judge
Rita M. Novak presiding.
As you are perhaps aware, Defendants, the Archdiocese of Chicago, Willis
of Illinois (Lloyd's of London's partner), American Airlines (British
Airlines' partner), United Airlines (Air Canada's and Air Iberia's
partners), Maximus and Unison-Maximus (managers of airport concessions
space including Duty Free, McDonalds, etc.), JP Morgan Chase and Bank
One, Bank of America, ABN AMRO and LaSalle Bank, and Citigroup are
accused of (1) commiting hundreds of counts of perjury on their Economic
Disclosure Statements, which include the Slavery Era Disclosure
Affidavit, and (2) submitting false claims on almost $5 billion in
contracts with the City of Chicago. We demand full compliance with the
Chicago Slavery Era Disclosure Ordinance, $15 billion in civil penalties
and fines, and legal fees.
Similar violations of Slavery Era Disclosure Ordinances have also been
committed by these Defendants, their affiliated entities, and other
contractors, in Philadelphia, Detroit, Wayne County, Milwaukee, Los
Angeles, San Francisco, Oakland, Berkeley and Richmond, California.
Defendants submitted a Joint Motion for Dismissal of our lawsuit in
Chicago. The Court has been fully briefed by all parties, and oral
arguments on this dismisal motion will be heard on November 9th. You
will not want to miss this Hearing!
We invite all of our supporters and friends to join us at the Daley
Center on November 9, 2007 and to bear witness to this historic
encounter in our centuries long and unyielding struggle for
accountability for the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, slavery, and
slave-like practices and conditions, including colonialism and
settler-colonialism, racism and white supremacy, segregation and apartheid.
Without your past and continuing support, we could not have filed this
lawsuit and pursued it this far. Victory is certain!
For those of you who can not come to Chicago, please send us an email,
no later than 5:00 pm EST on Monday, November 5, 2007, expressing your
solidarity and support. We will copy all emails received, bind and file
them with the Court on Tuesday.
Email your solidarity and support to:
Bob Brown
paroots02 at yahoo.com
Address your email to:
Judge Rita M. Novak
Circuit Court of Cook County
45 West Washington Street, Room 2607
Chicago, IL
Re: City of Chicago ex rel. Bob Brown vs Archdiocese of Chicago, et al
>From hakimida at reparationsthecure.org Thu Nov 22 09:40:06 2007
From: hakimida at reparationsthecure.org (Ida Hakim)
Date: Thu Nov 22 09:40:10 2007
Subject: [cure-news] Rejoicing in a cemetery
Message-ID: <4745A2D6.7050000 at reparationsthecure.org>
The End of American Thanksgivings
excerpt from the article
www.blackcommentator.com
Rejoicing in a cemetery
The English settlers, their ostensibly religious venture backed by a
trading company, were glad to discover that they had landed in a virtual
cemetery in 1620. Corn still sprouted in the abandoned fields of the
Wampanoags, but only a remnant of the local population remained around
the fabled Rock. In a letter to England, Massachusetts Bay colony
founder John Winthrop wrote, "But for the natives in these parts, God
hath so pursued them, as for 300 miles space the greatest part of them
are swept away by smallpox which still continues among them. So as God
hath thereby cleared our title to this place, those who remain in these
parts, being in all not 50, have put themselves under our protection."
Ever diligent to claim their own advantages as God?s will, the Pilgrims
thanked their deity for having ?pursued? the Indians to mass death.
However, it was not divine intervention that wiped out most of the
natives around the village of Patuxet but, most likely,
smallpox-embedded blankets planted during an English visit or slave
raid. Six years before the Pilgrim landing, a ship sailed into Patuxet?s
harbor, captained by none other than the famous seaman and mercenary
soldier John Smith, former leader of the first successful English colony
in the New World, at Jamestown, Virginia. Epidemic and slavery followed
in his wake, as Debra Glidden described in IMDiversity.com:
In 1614 the Plymouth Company of England, a joint stock company, hired
Captain John Smith to explore land in its behalf. Along what is now the
coast of Massachusetts in the territory of the Wampanoag, Smith visited
the town of Patuxet according to "The Colonial Horizon," a 1969 book
edited by William Goetzinan. Smith renamed the town Plymouth in honor of
his employers, but the Wampanoag who inhabited the town continued to
call it Patuxet.
The following year Captain Hunt, an English slave trader, arrived at
Patuxet. It was common practice for explorers to capture Indians, take
them to Europe and sell them into slavery for 220 shillings apiece. That
practice was described in a 1622 account of happenings entitled "A
Declaration of the State of the Colony and Affairs in Virginia," written
by Edward Waterhouse. True to the explorer tradition, Hunt kidnapped a
number of Wampanoags to sell into slavery.
Another common practice among European explorers was to give "smallpox
blankets" to the Indians. Since smallpox was unknown on this continent
prior to the arrival of the Europeans, Native Americans did not have any
natural immunity to the disease so smallpox would effectively wipe out
entire villages with very little effort required by the Europeans.
William Fenton describes how Europeans decimated Native American
villages in his 1957 work "American Indian and White relations to 1830."
>From 1615 to 1619 smallpox ran rampant among the Wampanoags and their
neighbors to the north. The Wampanoag lost 70 percent of their
population to the epidemic and the Massachusetts lost 90 percent.
Most of the Wampanoag had died from the smallpox epidemic so when the
Pilgrims arrived they found well-cleared fields which they claimed for
their own. A Puritan colonist, quoted by Harvard University's Perry
Miller, praised the plague that had wiped out the Indians for it was
"the wonderful preparation of the Lord Jesus Christ, by his providence
for his people's abode in the Western world."
Historians have since speculated endlessly on why the woods in the
region resembled a park to the disembarking Pilgrims in 1620. The reason
should have been obvious: hundreds, if not thousands, of people had
lived there just five years before.
In less than three generations the settlers would turn all of New
England into a charnel house for Native Americans, and fire the economic
engines of slavery throughout English-speaking America. Plymouth Rock is
the place where the nightmare truly began.
The uninvited?
It is not at all clear what happened at the first ? and only ?
?integrated? Thanksgiving feast. Only two written accounts of the
three-day event exist, and one of them, by Governor William Bradford,
was written 20 years after the fact. Was Chief Massasoit invited to
bring 90 Indians with him to dine with 52 colonists, most of them women
and children? This seems unlikely. A good harvest had provided the
settlers with plenty of food, according to their accounts, so the whites
didn?t really need the Wampanoag?s offering of five deer. What we do
know is that there had been lots of tension between the two groups that
fall. John Two-Hawks, who runs the Native Circle web site, gives a
sketch of the facts:
?Thanksgiving' did not begin as a great loving relationship between the
pilgrims and the Wampanoag, Pequot and Narragansett people. In fact, in
October of 1621 when the pilgrim survivors of their first winter in
Turtle Island sat down to share the first unofficial 'Thanksgiving'
meal, the Indians who were there were not even invited! There was no
turkey, squash, cranberry sauce or pumpkin pie. A few days before this
alleged feast took place, a company of 'pilgrims' led by Miles Standish
actively sought the head of a local Indian chief, and an 11 foot high
wall was erected around the entire Plymouth settlement for the very
purpose of keeping Indians out!?
It is much more likely that Chief Massasoit either crashed the party, or
brought enough men to ensure that he was not kidnapped or harmed by the
Pilgrims. Dr. Tingba Apidta, in his ?Black Folks? Guide to Understanding
Thanksgiving,? surmises that the settlers ?brandished their weaponry?
early and got drunk soon thereafter. He notes that ?each Pilgrim drank
at least a half gallon of beer a day, which they preferred even to
water. This daily inebriation led their governor, William Bradford, to
comment on his people's ?notorious sin,? which included their
?drunkenness and uncleanliness? and rampant ?sodomy.??
Soon after the feast the brutish Miles Standish ?got his bloody prize,?
Dr. Apidta writes:
?He went to the Indians, pretended to be a trader, then beheaded an
Indian man named Wituwamat. He brought the head to Plymouth, where it
was displayed on a wooden spike for many years, according to Gary B.
Nash, ?as a symbol of white power.? Standish had the Indian man's young
brother hanged from the rafters for good measure. From that time on, the
whites were known to the Indians of Massachusetts by the name
?Wotowquenange,? which in their tongue meant cutthroats and stabbers.?
What is certain is that the first feast was not called a ?Thanksgiving?
at the time; no further integrated dining occasions were scheduled; and
the first, official all-Pilgrim ?Thanksgiving? had to wait until 1637,
when the whites of New England celebrated the massacre of the
Wampanoag?s southern neighbors, the Pequots.
The real Thanksgiving Day Massacre
The Pequots today own the Foxwood Casino and Hotel, in Ledyard,
Connecticut, with gross gaming revenues of over $9 billion in 2000. This
is truly a (very belated) miracle, since the real first Pilgrim
Thanksgiving was intended as the Pequot?s epitaph. Sixteen years after
the problematical Plymouth feast, the English tried mightily to erase
the Pequots from the face of the Earth, and thanked God for the blessing.
Having subdued, intimidated or made mercenaries of most of the tribes of
Massachusetts, the English turned their growing force southward, toward
the rich Connecticut valley, the Pequot?s sphere of influence. At the
point where the Mystic River meets the sea, the combined force of
English and allied Indians bypassed the Pequot fort to attack and set
ablaze a town full of women, children and old people.
William Bradford, the former Governor of Plymouth and one of the
chroniclers of the 1621 feast, was also on hand for the great massacre
of 1637:
"Those that escaped the fire were slain with the sword; some hewed to
pieces, others run through with their rapiers, so that they were quickly
dispatched and very few escaped. It was conceived they thus destroyed
about 400 at this time. It was a fearful sight to see them thus frying
in the fire...horrible was the stink and scent thereof, but the victory
seemed a sweet sacrifice, and they gave the prayers thereof to God, who
had wrought so wonderfully for them, thus to enclose their enemies in
their hands, and give them so speedy a victory over so proud and
insulting an enemy."
The rest of the white folks thought so, too. ?This day forth shall be a
day of celebration and thanksgiving for subduing the Pequots," read
Governor John Winthrop?s proclamation. The authentic Thanksgiving Day
was born.
Most historians believe about 700 Pequots were slaughtered at Mystic.
Many prisoners were executed, and surviving women and children sold into
slavery in the West Indies. Pequot prisoners that escaped execution were
parceled out to Indian tribes allied with the English. The Pequot were
thought to have been extinguished as a people. According to IndyMedia,
?The Pequot tribe numbered 8,000 when the Pilgrims arrived, but disease
had brought their numbers down to 1,500 by 1637. The Pequot ?War? killed
all but a handful of remaining members of the tribe.?
But there were still too many Indians around to suit the whites of New
England, who bided their time while their own numbers increased to
critical, murderous mass.
Guest?s head on a pole
By the 1670s the colonists, with 8,000 men under arms, felt strong
enough to demand that the Pilgrims? former dinner guests the Wampanoags
disarm and submit to the authority of the Crown. After a series of
settler provocations in 1675, the Wampanoag struck back, under the
leadership of Chief Metacomet, son of Massasoit, called King Philip by
the English. Metacomet/Philip, whose wife and son were captured and sold
into West Indian slavery, wiped out 13 settlements and killed 600 adult
white men before the tide of battle turned. A 1996 issue of the
Revolutionary Worker provides an excellent narrative.
In their victory, the settlers launched an all-out genocide against the
remaining Native people. The Massachusetts government offered 20
shillings bounty for every Indian scalp, and 40 shillings for every
prisoner who could be sold into slavery. Soldiers were allowed to
enslave any Indian woman or child under 14 they could capture. The
"Praying Indians" who had converted to Christianity and fought on the
side of the European troops were accused of shooting into the treetops
during battles with "hostiles." They were enslaved or killed. Other
"peaceful" Indians of Dartmouth and Dover were invited to negotiate or
seek refuge at trading posts ? and were sold onto slave ships.
It is not known how many Indians were sold into slavery, but in this
campaign, 500 enslaved Indians were shipped from Plymouth alone. Of the
12,000 Indians in the surrounding tribes, probably about half died from
battle, massacre and starvation.
After King Philip's War, there were almost no Indians left free in the
northern British colonies. A colonist wrote from Manhattan's New York
colony: "There is now but few Indians upon the island and those few no
ways hurtful. It is to be admired how strangely they have decreased by
the hand of God, since the English first settled in these parts." In
Massachusetts, the colonists declared a "day of public thanksgiving" in
1676, saying, "there now scarce remains a name or family of them [the
Indians] but are either slain, captivated or fled."
Fifty-five years after the original Thanksgiving Day, the Puritans had
destroyed the generous Wampanoag and all other neighboring tribes. The
Wampanoag chief King Philip was beheaded. His head was stuck on a pole
in Plymouth, where the skull still hung on display 24 years later.
This is not thought to be a fit Thanksgiving tale for the children of
today, but it?s the real story, well-known to the settler children of
New England at the time ? the white kids who saw the Wampanoag head on
the pole year after year and knew for certain that God loved them best
of all, and that every atrocity they might ever commit against a
heathen, non-white was blessed.
There?s a good term for the process thus set in motion: nation-building.
Roots of the slave trade
The British North American colonists? practice of enslaving Indians for
labor or direct sale to the West Indies preceded the appearance of the
first chained Africans at the dock in Jamestown, Virginia, in 1619. The
Jamestown colonists? human transaction with the Dutch vessel was an
unscheduled occurrence. However, once the African slave trade became
commercially established, the fates of Indians and Africans in the
colonies became inextricably entwined. New England, born of
up-close-and-personal, burn-them-in-the-fires-of-hell genocide, led the
political and commercial development of the English colonies. The region
also led the nascent nation?s descent into a slavery-based society and
economy.
Ironically, an apologist for Virginian slavery made one of the best,
early cases for the indictment of New England as the engine of the
American slave trade. Unreconstructed secessionist Lewis Dabney?s 1867
book ?A Defense of Virginia? traced the slave trade?s origins all the
way back to Plymouth Rock:
The planting of the commercial States of North America began with the
colony of Puritan Independents at Plymouth, in 1620, which was
subsequently enlarged into the State of Massachusetts. The other trading
colonies, Rhode Island and Connecticut, as well as New Hampshire (which
never had an extensive shipping interest), were offshoots of
Massachusetts. They partook of the same characteristics and pursuits;
and hence, the example of the parent colony is taken here as a fair
representation of them.
The first ship from America, which embarked in the African slave trade,
was the Desire, Captain Pierce, of Salem; and this was among the first
vessels ever built in the colony. The promptitude with which the
"Puritan Fathers" embarked in this business may be comprehended, when it
is stated that the Desire sailed upon her voyage in June, 1637. [Note:
the year they massacred the Pequots.] The first feeble and dubious
foothold was gained by the white man at Plymouth less than seventeen
years before; and as is well known, many years were expended by the
struggle of the handful of settlers for existence. So that it may be
correctly said, that the commerce of New England was born of the slave
trade; as its subsequent prosperity was largely founded upon it. The
Desire, proceeding to the Bahamas, with a cargo of "dry fish and strong
liquors, the only commodities for those parts," obtained the negroes
from two British men-of-war, which had captured them from a Spanish slaver.
Thus, the trade of which the good ship Desire, of Salem, was the
harbinger, grew into grand proportions; and for nearly two centuries
poured a flood of wealth into New England, as well as no inconsiderable
number of slaves. Meanwhile, the other maritime colonies of Rhode Island
and Providence Plantations, and Connecticut, followed the example of
their elder sister emulously; and their commercial history is but a
repetition of that of Massachusetts. The towns of Providence, Newport,
and New Haven became famous slave trading ports. The magnificent harbor
of the second, especially, was the favorite starting-place of the slave
ships; and its commerce rivaled, or even exceeded, that of the present
commercial metropolis, New York. All the four original States, of
course, became slaveholding.
The Revolution that exploded in 1770s New England was undertaken by men
thoroughly imbued with the worldview of the Indian-killer and
slave-holder. How could they not be? The ?country? they claimed as their
own was fathered by genocide and mothered by slavery ? its true
distinction among the commercial nations of the world. And these men
were not ashamed, but proud, with vast ambition to spread their
exceptional characteristics West and South and wherever their so-far
successful project in nation-building might take them ? and by the same
bloody, savage methods that had served them so well in the past.
At the moment of deepest national crisis following the battle of
Gettysburg in 1863, President Abraham Lincoln invoked the national fable
that is far more central to the white American personality than
Lincoln?s battlefield ?Address.? Lincoln seized upon the 1621 feast as
the historic ?Thanksgiving? ? bypassing the official and authentic 1637
precedent ? and assigned the dateless, murky event the fourth Thursday
in November.
Lincoln surveyed a broken nation, and attempted nation-rebuilding, based
on the purest white myth. The same year that he issued the Emancipation
Proclamation, he renewed the national commitment to a white manifest
destiny that began at Plymouth Rock. Lincoln sought to rekindle a shared
national mission that former Confederates and Unionists and white
immigrants from Europe could collectively embrace. It was and remains a
barbaric and racist national unifier, by definition. Only the most
fantastic lies can sanitize the history of the Plymouth Colony of
Massachusetts.
More information about the Cure-news
mailing list